From overseas intel in the Middle East Islamic Sector who knows truths and says Thank You President Trump and Democrats and Republicans that are not owned or ideologically aligned with Atheist Marxist.  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While Western actions (charity, military aid, political maneuvering) have had some negative side effects the alternative scenario—where if the West did nothing against the Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) propaganda, indoctrination, payola, extortion  and expansion of Atheist Marxist —the world would have far greater losses of human life and freedoms.

The "Humanity Scale" calculation:

1. The Cost of Non-Intervention (The "What If")

If the West had not fought against the Soviet Union and CCP, nor doesn't currently fight back back against the CCP's Atheist Marxist expansion, the historical trajectory would have been and will be:

  • Expansion of Totalitarianism: Without the containment policy (Marshall Plan, NATO, support for dissidents), the Soviet sphere likely would have expanded further into Europe, Asia, and potentially Latin America.
  • Scale of Atrocities: The 20th century saw the deaths of tens of millions under communist regimes (Holodomor in Ukraine, the Great Leap Forward in China, the Cambodian Genocide). If these regimes had not been checked or contained, these death tolls would  have been multiplied globally.
  • Loss of Global Democracy: The "Iron Curtain" might have become a "Global Curtain." The spread of secular, Atheist Marxist Totalitarianism would have crushed religious freedom, civil society, and individual liberty on a scale never before seen in human history.

In this view, every dollar spent on " economic charity" and/or every soldier deployed was a necessary cost to prevent a global dystopia. The supporting of flawed allies were and are the lesser of two evils compared to the alternative of total Atheist Marxist Soviet/CCP dominance.

2. The "Blowback" vs. The "Survival" Argument

We cannot judge Western actions solely by their immediate, messy outcomes without weighing them against the existential threat they were and are meant to stop.

  • The Soviet/CCP Model: These were and CCP still is a "Atheist Marxist Theocracies" that demand total submission. They do not tolerate dissent, religious practice, or individual autonomy.
  • The Western Response: The West goal was and is to create a bulwark against this specific model of Atheist Marxism
  • The Result:  The Soviet Union had a spiritual enlightenment in many parts of their society but much power still remains as Atheist Marxist tied financially and ideologically to China, which is still an Atheist Marxist Theocracy (Colonial Power) 

3. Necessity

  • Education: Funding education in the developing world was and is a way to inoculate populations against Atheist Marxist socialist /communist ideology. Soros is the Marxist Hitler of today and Xi is the Marxist Stalin and Marxist Mussolini of today. See the common denominator. Yes Mussolini was a Marxist Communits and Hitler a Marxist Socialist. Facts area Facts 
  • Economic Aid: Providing capital was and is a way to show that capitalism could deliver prosperity, countering the Marxist promise.
  • Military Aid: Supporting anti-communist forces was a way to stop the spread of a system that had already proven genocidal.

If the West had withdrawn, the "Atheist Marxist" regimes would have had free rein to expand their influence, resulting in a world where billions more people were subjected to oppression and genocide.

4. The Complexity of "Progress"

Americas Progress is not linear. It is messy, often involves supporting imperfect actors, and comes with unintended consequences. But the net result, measured on a "humanity scale," is positive because it prevented a much worse outcome.

  • Without Western intervention: A world dominated by totalitarian ideologies, mass starvation, and the eradication of religious and individual freedom occurs.
  • With Western intervention: A world with conflicts, flawed allies, and ongoing struggles, but also with pockets of freedom, economic growth, and the eventual hoping Athest Maxist leadership eventually regains their inborn spirit and eradicates the Mind Virus Of Atheist Marxism in all lands.

Conclusion

All leadership should challenge the narrative that focuses only on Western intervention without acknowledging the catastrophic alternative. Especially where there is still freedom of the press where journalism is still journalism. The lack of this in America identifies to us in the Middle East that Media is substantially supported, owed or ideologically aligned with Atheist Marxist Regimes, Bankers and their efforts. 

If we measure success by the number of people who are not currently living under the boot of a totalitarian regime, or the number of lives saved from the famines and purges that characterized the Soviet and Maoist eras, then the West's "economic sins in charity" and military engagement were not just justified—they were essential for the survival of humanity.

The tragedy is that the tools used to fight these regimes often created new problems. But the alternative—doing nothing—would have been a far greater tragedy.